At Radial, we’re committed to producing high-quality, evidence-based content that empowers readers to make informed health decisions. These editorial standards ensure accuracy, clarity, inclusivity, and transparency—while also maintaining trust with our audience and meeting the highest ethical and legal standards.

‍

1. Mission & editorial values

Our mission is to provide accurate, accessible, and compassionate health information that helps readers navigate complex health decisions with confidence. We aim to break down medical topics in a way that is easy to understand, free from unnecessary alarm, and respectful of all lived experiences.

Our values are reflected in every piece we publish:

• Accuracy over sensationalism
• Clarity over complexity
• Empathy over fear
• Inclusivity over generalization

‍

2. Tone

We write the way we’d want a trusted friend to explain things: warm, honest, and supportive. That means avoiding jargon when possible, using affirming and inclusive language, and being sensitive to how people of all backgrounds may relate to a topic.

We avoid stigmatizing or outdated terminology and represent diverse experiences across race, gender, age, ability, and identity. Content that covers identity-related issues should reflect cultural sensitivity and accuracy.

‍

3. Content standards: evidence-Based & reviewed

Evidence-based accuracy

All health content is rooted in current, peer-reviewed research and expert-reviewed sources. We reference reputable publications, government health organizations, and accredited institutions to ensure accuracy and credibility.

Rigorous review process

All of our content undergoes a structured review process for accuracy, completeness, and tone. Editors collaborate closely with qualified healthcare professionals, both on the Radial clinical team and outside of it, as medical reviewers, fact-checkers, and subject matter experts with relevant expertise to uphold our editorial standards.

Regular updates

We aim to review and update our articles periodically to reflect evolving medical knowledge and guidelines.

‍

4. Sourcing & citations

Source integrity

We reference only reputable and up-to-date sources, such as peer-reviewed journals, academic institutions, and government health agencies. We avoid anonymous or unreliable sources, and prioritize human studies unless noted otherwise.

Citation practices

Sources are cited clearly within the article or in a reference section at the end, allowing readers to easily verify the information provided.

‍

5. Corrections & updates

If any errors or outdated recommendations are discovered, they are corrected promptly through our review process. Our editorial team maintains a proactive schedule to ensure all content reflects the latest standards in medical research, clinical guidelines, and public health understanding. 

We welcome reader feedback to continuously improve the accuracy and relevance of our content. Readers may contact support@meetradial.com with corrections or suggestions.

‍

6. Legal notices & disclaimers

Medical disclaimer

The content published by Radial is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.

‍

7. Copyright and ownership

All editorial content is the property of Radial and may not be reproduced, distributed, or republished without written permission.

Affiliate & advertising disclosure

From time to time, Radial may include affiliate links or sponsored content. Any such relationships will be clearly disclosed, and they do not influence editorial content or medical recommendations.

AI or ghostwriting use

Some content may be created or edited using AI-assisted tools or contracted writers. All final content is reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy, consistency, and alignment with our editorial standards.

‍

8. Continuous improvement and adaptation

Our editorial standards are living guidelines. We regularly review and refine them in response to new research, evolving language, reader feedback, and shifts in public understanding. Our aim is to meet the highest possible editorial standards while adapting to changing needs.

‍